Album Review: Soundgarden- Superunknown (20th Anniversary Reissue)
For some reason, when I was 11, I was not allowed to buy a
copy of Superunknown by Soundgarden.
It was the summer of 1994 (a year I’ve written about
somewhat extensively) and “Black Hole Sun” was, like, everywhere—specifically
MTV, where I would stop what I was doing, and watch the video, transfixed at
the then “cutting edge” special effects.
I was all set to plunk down my hard earned allowance money
on a copy of the CD, but a few days prior, my mother informed me I was not
allowed to buy this album.
Since this was, you know, twenty years ago, I can’t remember
her reasoning behind this, and I’m sure if I were to ask her now, she wouldn’t
even recall this exchange. Perhaps she was informed by someone she worked with
that it was not an appropriate album for an 11 year old to be purchasing, or
perhaps she thought the song “Spoonman” was really about heroin (it’s not.)
Anyway, after probably being upset about this decision for
roughly five minutes, I got over it, and my life has, for the most part, gone
on just fine because of this. Because let’s face it, I doubt that I would have
hung on to my copy of Superunkown for
the last twenty years. Two years after this, I bought the band’s (then) final
album, Down on The Up Side, and then
the following year, after their unceremonious breakup, the A-Sides singles compilation. Both of those ended up in a stack
taken in to a used CD place a long, long time ago, traded for cash long spent
on something else that was certainly very, very important.
The reason that I am revisiting the Knights of the Sound
Table, and their seminal release, is because it’s celebrating that big
milestone this year, and because nostalgia, the band has spared no expense in
putting together a reissue of Superunknown,
the album that is responsible for plucking them from Seattle grunge obscurity,
into “Modern Rock” superstars.
Depending on how dedicated to the game you are, there is
actually a variety of reissues to choose from—the most extravagant stretching
out over four CDs, including the original album (remastered, obviously), as
well as b-sides, live tracks, and demos of the songs you’ve come to know and
love.
Maybe it’s because I listened to Soundgarden so casually,
and when I was younger, I was less into the whole album, and more into the singles/songs
I knew, but I always equate them as being a “singles band”—meaning that they
have some really strong material, but then the rest of the album is just kind
of there. It’s not bad, but it’s also not necessarily great either. Superunknown boasts the arguably the
band’s two biggest, most well-known tunes—“Spoonman,” and “Black Hole Sun,” as
well as the downcast “Fell on Black Days,” and the satirical “The Day I Tried
to Live.”
I can’t say that this album has, like, aged poorly or
gracefully, since this is literally the first time I’ve heard it, in its
entirety. So I also can’t really comment on if the remastering job has made
this sound exponentially better than it did twenty years ago. Or, if like most
remasters, things are just louder. And while their 1991 effort, Badmotorfinger sounds incredibly dated
by today’s standards, Superunknown is
one of those albums that strikes a balance between sounding like an artifact
while somehow maintaining relevancy—is it a total product of the time? Well
yes, of course it is. But is it also timeless enough to sound like it could be
made today? Yeah, somehow it does—you can hear echoes of it in any “Modern Rock”
record released today with huge, expensive sounding production values—think Foo
Fighters, Queens of The Stone Age, etc.
For the longtime, hardcore Soundgarden fan, a four disc set
loaded with various demos and rehearsal takes of Superunknown may sound amazing, and like a wise use of your resources.
To a casual listener—much of this I can stand to do without. Like how many
different versions of “Fell on Black Days” do I need? At least five, you say?
And how many piss-take non-album tracks are warranted? Another five? Oh ok. If
you say so.
But that’s the issue with these expansive reissues that are
often weighed down by ephemera.
One thing that is of some interest are the demo recordings
of many of Superunknown’s tracks—the
fidelity is slightly degraded during some of the heavier moments due to the
tape it was committed to, but even more of a fascinating artifact than the
album itself are these primitive incarnations of the songs, and then to see how
polished and tight they became during the course of recording the record.
Listening to Superunknown
twenty years later isn’t going to suddenly turn me into some kind of
Soundgarden superfan, though it is making me incredibly nostalgic for the
mid-90s. But then again, I think for most people in my age demographic,
nostalgia for that time period is already at an all-time high. It has been
worthwhile to hear this record from start to finish, and aside from revisiting
my appreciation for some of the singles, it did confirm that while catchy,
“Spoonman” is kind of not that great of a song, and lyrically sometimes it’s insipid,
and finally, that a non-single like the gloomy, heavy duty “Fourth of July”
rocks pretty hard.
The Superunknown reissue is out now via Universal.
Hey man! Found your blog via twitter, enjoying the variety of references to The Roots, Hunter S., Foster Wallace, etc. This review, too, catches my attention because I have been (at times) a big Cornell fan - more Temple of the Dog, less Timbaland, though.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, this passage is especially good: "But even more of a fascinating artifact than the album itself are these primitive incarnations of the songs, and then to see how polished and tight they became during the course of recording the record."
I've enjoyed listening to old, old outtakes of Alice in Chains and Nirvana for just this reason, to hear the songs progress and change and improve. It takes some balls for a band to expose those dirtier, less perfect moments, especially after seeing how ugly the St. Anger thing turned out for 'Tallica.
You've got a cool thing going here. Keep it up!
Also...is your site's name a reference to Colson Whitehead? Jeez. Cool stuff.
ReplyDeleteayo brendan
Deletethanks for checking out the site and for all of the positive feedback. i always appreciate hearing from folks that dig what i'm doing.
anyway, the site's name is partially a reference to a quote from Infinite Jest. but i will mos def check out colson whitehead now after you mentioned him.